Ir al contenido principal

What does it mean for Trump that his former lawyer declares herself guilty and agrees to testify for the prosecution in Georgia?

 Sidney Powell, along with Rudolph Giuliani, was the advanced legitimate who tried to reverse Trump’s defeat risk Joe Biden in 2020. He now acknowledges that he participated in an illegal manoeuvre to distort the outcome and will be able to testify heavily in the case against the former president.



With squabbling arguments about an alleged discretionary fraud that were rejected by courts in several U.S. states, Sidney Powell has become one of Donald Trump’s top legal advisers since the former president refused to acknowledge his defeat in the 2020 elections.

Having belonged to Trump’s closest circle, the lawyer born in 1955 in North Carolina now profile herself as one of the voices that could do the most harm to the former ambassador.

Powell was surprised to be charged in the appointive interference case in Georgia, in which she, Trump and 17 others were accused of violating the state's organized crime law.

A judge agreed that Powell will serve six years on conditional release, pay a fine of $2,700 and write a letter to offer an apology to Georgia's voters. And, most importantly, he will honestly testify against tasks his co-accused.

Powell is a valuable voice for the Georgia v. Trump case

Powell was initially charged with extortion and six other freights as part of a comprehensive plan to keep the Republican president in power after he lost the 2020 elections to Democrat Joe Biden. Prosecutors say she also participated in an unauthorized violation of the discretionary equipment at an appointive office in Georgia's country county.

If prosecutors force her to testify, she could provide information about a press conference she participated in on behalf of Trump and his campaign shortly after the election, and about a White House meeting she attended in mid-December that year, during which strategies and theories were explained and factors that influenced the outcome of the election were discussed.

And not just his story. Powell could also provide documents in his possession illustrating Trump’s plan to remain in power despite losing his Democratic rival’s bet.

Amy Lee Copeland, a former financial government in Savannah, Georgia, told The Everyday Monster website that "the fact that she was at a White House meeting can testify to what Trump said at that meeting. And we don't have many people willing to do that. That will be very important to the prosecutor's office."

Copeland referred to a meeting held on December 18, 2020 at the Oval Office, which was a focal point for investigators of the assault on the Capitol on January 6, 2021. At that meeting, Powell suggested that Trump order US military forces to seize voting machines in some states where Biden had won.

Trump’s defense doesn’t worry about Powell’s change

Without a ban, Trump’s head attorney in the Georgia case, Steve Sadow, commented positively on Powell’s declaration of guilt and said that “assuming there will be honest statements in the Fulton County case, it will be ideal for my overall defence strategy.”

Legal experts interpret Powell’s conviction as a significant triumph for Fulton County monetary Fani Willis, and his strategy of obtaining indictees’ testimony to seek a conviction to his target head: Trump.

Renato Mariotti, an ex-monetary government, said Powell could now weaken the defence of Trump's lawyers and some former attorneys. They will probably claim that providing legitimate advice to a client is not a crime. But now that he has declared himself punishable, Powell "is a problem for that group," Mariotti told Time magazine.

After Powell declared guilty, lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, another of the accused of participating in the 2020 false voter plot, specifically in Georgia’s electing subversion case, also did so.

Powell's transition from a successful monetary lawyer to a convicted

Powell, 68, played monetary government bets on becoming a prominent independent lawyer in Dallas. While working for Trump, he filed lawsuits in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Arizona, states where Biden had been prosecuted. All were rejected by the courts.

He also presented the blurred hypothesis that the alleged discretionary fraud against Trump was perpetrated with a programming electing created "under the direction of Hugo Chávez", the Venezuelan president who died in 2013. The company electing Domain Elector Frameworks sued her for defamation, a litigation still ongoing.

The Georgia case is one of four criminal cases that Trump faces simultaneously. Trump still attributes his defeat in 2020 an alleged discretionary fraud.

It has not yet been defined when Georgia’s trial of Trump and the other defendants will begin.